SPRAINS AND STRAINS

Posted: under General health.
Tags:

A sprain is the tearing of the ligaments, fibrous structures which support the joints. The most common sprains occur on the limbs, such as sprained ankles, wrists and thumbs, but can affect almost any joint if the ligaments are suddenly or excessively stretched beyond the normal range of movement. ‘Whiplash’, for example is the spraining of the ligaments between the vertabrae of the neck. The joint will swell and often bruise and will be extremely painful.

Initially, sprains should be treated much the same way as bruises. Much of the pain of sprains arises from the swelling and the bleeding in the tissues. Immediately apply ice to the area and elevate the affected limb. Rest as much as possible. Apply arnica as a cream or tincture, or a compress of either arnica or comfrey root, directly on the swelling. Under medical supervision only, arnica can be taken in tablet form to help limit the bruising and Vitamin C and the herb horsetail aid the healing of muscle tissue. Initially, the joint may be strapped firmly to provide support, limit swelling and ease the pain. Soon, however, gentle massage and movement is required to prevent the ligament tissues shortening and tightening as they heal. To begin with, a physiotherapist will only stroke the affected area firmly, progressing to deeper tissue massage with fingers and thumbs only when the injury is healing. Hydrotherapy can also help the patient maintain movement and build up strength in the joint. Note that sprains take longer to heal than fractures do, up to six or eight weeks, and that a joint which has been sprained may be permanently weakened and more prone to dislocation, requiring special care and strapping with elastic bandage when exercising.

Rather than arising from one single over extension of the joints, strains result from the overuse of muscles, through careless exercise or even because of poor work practices. Strained muscles can result in temporary discomfort or the development of more serious nerve and muscle conditions.

*57\69\2*

Comments (0) Apr 29 2009

ST JOHN’S WORT IN THE ELDERLY: GRETA’S STORY

Posted: under Anti Depressants-Sleeping Aid.
Tags:

When Greta, a 69-year-old woman referred to Professor Volz by her GP, was asked what was troubling her, depression was the furthest condition from her mind. Instead she complained of many physical ailments – headache, stomach ache, tiredness and an unpleasant taste in her mouth. Her GP had been unable to find any physical explanation for these symptoms and the only abnormality he could detect was a slight problem with cardiac conduction, as measured by EKG. She had complained of sleep difficulties, for which she had been treated with sleeping pills with some success.

When Dr Volz questioned her, it became apparent that her difficulties had begun about two years before, shortly after her husband died unexpectedly of a heart attack. Despite having enough money and a close relationship with her son, who lived in the same town and visited her twice a week, Greta complained of sadness and hopelessness but, she hastened to add, ‘only when I am alone’. Dr Volz tried to explain to her that her symptoms might be due to depression, but she vehemently objected to such an explanation. When he suggested that she might benefit from a drug such as Prozac, she refused to take any synthetic antidepressants, insisting ‘that’s all chemical stuff.’ After two further visits with Dr Volz, he suggested that she might try St John’s Wort. To his astonishment, she immediately agreed to take this because ‘herbs are not dangerous.’

Dr Volz started Greta on St John’s Wort at a dosage of 900 mg per day. He noticed no improvement until she had been on the herbal remedy for six weeks, and it took another 10 weeks before Greta’s symptoms were reduced to a significant degree. Greta remains convinced that the improvement she has enjoyed on St John’s Wort has nothing to do with relief from depression but rather to ‘non-specific’ effects of the herb. Dr Volz feels no need to challenge this belief. She is no longer depressed and her mood has been stable without any adverse effects whatsoever – reward enough for a caring doctor.

*32\75\2*

Comments (0) Apr 29 2009

CASE STUDY: BRAIN-FAG WITH MEMORY LOSS AND IRRITABILITY

Posted: under Allergies.
Tags:

One characteristic of the brain-fag problem is an acute loss of memory. Norma Tolliver came to me for this problem. A year earlier, she had been pursuing a promising career as a buyer for a large manufacturing concern. Her forte was her outstanding memory. She knew the sizes, colors, weights, and other specifications of the company’s products, as well as the names and phone numbers of the shipping lines, manufacturers, and other colleagues by heart. Her employers called her the “walking encyclopedia” and relied upon her to have information at the tips of her fingers.

She never failed to supply the information they sought. Then, without warning, her memory began to fade. A succession of doctors analyzed her problem as psychological in origin and offered a number of imaginative explanations. Tolliver tried desperately to hold onto her position, surrounding herself with thick notebooks filled with data of all sorts. This was a transparent device, and her employers became disillusioned, suspecting her of having tricked them all along. Eventually, she was fired.

Testing in a hospital setting revealed serious susceptibility to corn and wheat. Ingestion of these two foods had led to mental cloudiness, memory impairment, and other signs of brain-fag.

Her reaction to the oat test was most dramatic, however. This was her last food test in the hospital, made necessary by the fact (initially overlooked) that she ate oats in some form almost every day: oatmeal porridge, oatmeal cookies, and so forth. After twenty minutes, the test seemed to be negative, and I left the hospital. Miss Tolliver, however, went into a severe reaction to the oats, as was revealed when a nurse’s assistant came into her room and made an innocent comment. Miss Tolliver misinterpreted the comment and became very annoyed; she insisted that the nurse apologize and angrily started calling all over the hospital, demanding to be discharged and cursing out the administrators. It was only in retrospect that she realized that her reaction was, indeed, a cerebral reaction to a common food eaten with addictive regularity—the oats. In fact, this sort of violent moodiness was familiar to her from previous reactions. Avoidance of her incriminated foods, particularly the three grains mentioned, led to an increase in her mental acuity. She eventually found and kept another job.

When brain-fag was first diagnosed, it was believed that food allergy was the sole cause. After 1950, clinical ecologists became aware of the importance of the chemical environment to health. Cases began to be seen which were primarily caused by exposure to common environmental chemicals.

*83\110\2*

Comments (0) Apr 28 2009

LEVELS OF REACTION IN ENVIRONMENTAL DISEASE

Posted: under Allergies.
Tags:

In the preceding section, the basic concepts of food and chemical susceptibility were presented. In this section, we shall examine how such reactions actually affect patients with a variety of illnesses which are rarely helped by conventional medicine.

The chapters in this section are rather arbitrarily organized around particular diseases. This is, of course, the way conventional medicine, and most patients, think of their ailments. In actuality, however, most susceptible patients have a constellation of diseases, with few clear-cut distinctions between them. The headache patient, if questioned, may turn out to have many localized problems, on the one hand, and a tendency toward depression on the other. Or he may vacillate between periods of exuberance and energy and subsequent “hangovers.”

It is the orthodox, overly analytical medical system which insists on pigeonholing patients into disease categories, and, particularly, separating physical from “mental” or “emotional” problems. Whatever the practical benefits of such a scheme, it fails to describe these various complaints as part of an overall continuum of ill-health in the life of each individual patient.

What is meant by “headache” or “arthritis” below, then, is a stage of illness in which arthritis or headache is the principal, but rarely the sole, complaint. These levels of reaction were first described in 1956.1

The bulk of the cases presented here fall either into the plus-two, the minus-two, or the minus-three categories. In other words, they are intermediate between the least and the most extreme cases of both stimulation and withdrawal. The reasons for my emphasis on these conditions are as follows.

*53\110\2*

Comments (0) Apr 28 2009

CHILDREN’S HEALTH: FUNNEL CHEST

Posted: under General health.
Tags:

Funnel chest is a condition in which the breastbone is depressed or sunken in. The breastbone (sternum) connects the front end of the ribs. The diaphragm (a band of muscle separating the chest and abdominal cavities) attaches in front to the lower ribs and to the bottom of the breastbone. In children, the ribs are made of tough elastic tissue called cartilage; this cartilage gradually hardens into bone as the child grows. Since cartilage is not as strong as bone, the ribs of a baby are delicate, but the diaphragm is relatively strong. When some babies breathe in, the diaphragm pulls in the lower half of the breastbone, causing a hollow in the center of the chest. This hollow is exaggerated when the child makes a greater effort to breathe, as with bronchitis, pneumonia, and choking. This condition, called retracting, is a sign of breathing difficulty. If retracting occurs only when the child has difficulty breathing, it is not considered to be a true funnel chest.

A true funnel chest exists if the breastbone is depressed when the child breathes out, even while the child is at rest and is having no difficulty breathing. If mild or moderate, a funnel chest will cause no harm and will gradually correct itself over the years as the child’s ribs grow heavier and stronger. If funnel chest is severe, it may not correct itself and may interfere with breathing. Rarely is it severe enough to affect the position or functioning of the heart.

Signs and symptoms

A funnel chest can be seen by observing the chest of a well child. The breastbone appears to be sunken in, forming a hollow in the center of the chest. If this hollow appears whenever the child breathes out, this may be a sign of true funnel chest.

If a child has not previously shown signs of a funnel chest, retractions of the lower breastbone are an important sign of breathing difficulty.

Home care

A fixed deformity (true funnel chest) cannot be treated at home. Bring it to the attention of your doctor.

If retractions of the breastbone begin in a child with no earlier signs of funnel chest, look for other signs of breathing difficulty. Then treat the disease that is causing the breathing problems.

Precautions

• Don’t be alarmed by persistent mild to moderate depression of the breastbone in an infant or young child.

• Do not restrict your child’s activities.

Medical treatment

The doctor will determine if the child has a true funnel chest or if the child is having temporary difficulty breathing. In marked cases of funnel chest, the severity and effect on heart and lungs is judged by X ray and other test results.

If funnel chest is severe and persists without gradual improvement, the condition may require surgery. Surgery may be performed if there are signs of limited heart or lung function or for cosmetic reasons. Your doctor may order X rays, an electrocardiogram, and measurements of the lung capacity.

*78/84/5*

Comments (0) Apr 28 2009

CHOLESTEROL: CANCER AND HEART FAILURE AS POTENTIAL SIDE EFFECTS OF STATIN DRUGS

Posted: under Men's Health-Erectile Dysfunction.
Tags:

Cancer: In every study done on rodents, statins have caused cancer. A review published in the Journal of the American Medical Association states that “All members of the two most popular classes of lipid-lowering drugs (the fibrates and the statins) cause cancer in rodents, in some cases at levels of animal exposure close to those prescribed to humans.” Studies done on humans have not produced such dramatic results because cancer is a disease that takes a long time to develop, and most clinical trials done on statins have not gone on for more than two or three years. This same study made the following final statement: “the results of experiments in animals and humans suggest that lipid-lowering drug treatment, especially with the fibrates and statins, should be avoided except in patients at high short-term risk of coronary heart disease.” These studies have been conveniently forgotten, because millions of patients around the world are being put on cholesterol lowering drugs even if they have very few risk factors. Statins are also a drug that must be taken for life. One study done on humans, called the CARE trial found that breast cancer rates in those taking statins went up 1500 percent. Statins may get your cholesterol down, but at what price?

Heart Failure: The world has experienced an enormous increase in the incidence of congestive heart failure. The incidence of heart attacks has gone down slightly, but heart failure rates are going up. In Australia there are approximately 300 000 people currently living with heart failure, with 30 000 people being newly diagnosed each year. Congestive heart failure occurs when the heart becomes weaker and cannot pump blood around the body as well as it should. Over time the heart becomes enlarged, thickened, and continues to get weaker. It becomes much less efficient at pumping blood.

Statins deplete the body of Co Enzyme Q10; the heart is a muscle, and heavily relies on Co Q 10 for energy. Without Co Q10, the mitochondria in the cells making up the heart cannot produce enough energy, leading to muscle weakness. The higher your dose of statins, and the longer you take them, the more likely you are to end up with heart failure. Ironically, virtually all patients with heart failure are placed on statins, supposedly to protect them against heart attacks, even if their cholesterol is normal.

*23/53/5*

Comments (0) Apr 23 2009

METHODS OF CONTRACEPTION: VAGINAL SPERMICIDES, CAP AND SPONGE

Posted: under Women's Health.
Tags:

Vaginal spermicides (foams, jellies, creams, film)

These substances kill sperms on their way to meet an egg and must be put into the vagina before intercourse. They are unsafe as a sole method of contraception and should be used along with a sheath or a diaphragm. Follow the instructions for the brand you intend to use. Most are active for only 1-3 hours.

Advantages

• Easy to use.

• Can be bought without a prescription.

• Work well if used together with a barrier method.

Disadvantages

• Not reliable except when combined with a barrier method.

• Can be messy as they melt and run out of the vagina.

• Put some men off oral sex. If this is a problem insert the spermicide just before intercourse.

• May have medical side-effects.

Research shows that liver function is altered and blood pressure lowered in some women using spermicides. They are absorbed from the vagina, especially if left in place for long periods.

• You can’t bath or have a wash on a bidet for six hours after sex.

The cap (diaphragm)

This is a dome-shaped barrier made of latex rather like a sheath. It has to be used with a spermicide to be safe. It is a good method for many women but it has to be supplied by a doctor, who will measure the woman for the correct size. For best results it must be used properly.

Advantages

• It is cheap and easy to use.

• It is nearly as safe as the Pill.

• There are no medical or health side-effects.

• It can be used to hold back menstrual flow to make for more pleasant love-making during a period.

Disadvantages

• It is not suitable for the woman who dislikes handling her genitals.

• It interferes with sensation in some women, especially those who enjoy the front wall of their vagina (around the G-spot) being stimulated during intercourse.

• It has to be put in well before sex and this removes the spontaneity for many women who find such ‘premeditated’ preparation un-sexy.

• It is easy to forget that it is in place for a day or two.

• It has to be supplied by a trained person in the first place.

• It should ideally be checked every six months by a trained person to see that the fit has not changed. This is especially important soon after a baby.

• It is easy for small holes, invisible to the naked eye, to develop which render the barrier ineffective.

• It interferes with sensation in those men who like to feel their partner’s cervix hitting against the tip of the penis.

How to use it

Place 3 or 4 inches of spermicidal jelly on the inside of the cap and spread some around the rim too. Insert the cap in the way that you have been taught and do so well in advance of intercourse. If you don’t have sex within 3 hours use more spermicide in the vagina. Don’t remove the cap for at least six hours after intercourse. If you have sex more than once during this six hours use more spermicide without removing the cap.

Look after the cap well. Remove it gently after intercourse ensuring that you don’t damage the dome with your nails. Wash it with plain, warm water and leave it out to dry. Never use perfumed soap or detergent to wash it. Never use Vaseline or disinfectant or you will spoil it. Hold it up to a good light every month and look for obvious holes. If there is any sign of damage, get a new one. Never wear a cap for more than twenty-four hours without removing and washing it.

The sponge

This is a disc of spermicide-impregnated sponge that the woman places in the vagina before intercourse.

Advantages

• Fairly easy to use.

• A good, non-permanent, barrier method.

Disadvantages

• All the disadvantages of absorbing spermicides into the bloodstream.

• Must be left in place for six hours after intercourse.

• It has to be thrown away after a single use and so is expensive.

• It can be felt in the vagina by the man’s penis or fingers.

• It is rather unreliable (75-85 per cent effective only) and so is really only suitable for couples who want to space their children rather than those who want to be absolutely sure about fertility control.

*12/72/5*

Comments (0) Apr 23 2009

DEFEATING DISEASES: TAKING CARE OF YOUR HEART

Posted: under General health.
Tags:

Hanging around the house in your underwear stinking of cheap booze and cigars, eating artery-clogging fast food, and yelling at the television-not exactly the picture of a man primed to defy death by squeezing every last drop out of life. But as it turns out, neither is focusing solely on improving your emotional outlook or adopting an outlandish cure or two.

“Let’s put it this way: You’ll never be able to cut open a vitamin E capsule, sprinkle it over a hot-fudge sundae, and not have to worry about the sundae,” says Dr. Lichtenstein. To beat heart disease, “you may have to make major fundamental adjustments that become habitual. Accept that taking care of your heart is going to be a lifelong project.” But it’s really not as difficult as you might think it is. Here’s how it’s done.

Know your risk. It’s true. Some guys have all the luck (thanks for the reminder, Rod Stewart). And some guys have higher risk factors than others. For example, you’re at risk for heart disease if a first-degree male relative (like a brother or your dad) under age 55 or a first-degree female relative (like a sister or your mother) under age 65 has suffered a heart attack. If you have both, naturally you’re at a higher risk. Got diabetes? High blood pressure? High cholesterol? Low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol? Do you smoke? All six? Your risk is higher still. “Those are your major risk factors, and once you have your cholesterol measured, some kind of decision can be made about just how much risk you have. But you really can’t tell until you’ve had your cholesterol checked,” Dr. Lichtenstein says.

Cut your total cholesterol. You’ve heard it so many times, you’re starting to think LDL stands for “lower, dummy, lower.” But bear with us. Reducing the “bad” LDL (low-density lipoprotein) cholesterol generated by your diet and raising your “good” HDL cholesterol with exercise can dramatically cut your risk for heart disease. As you probably know, LDL is called the bad cholesterol because it can penetrate artery walls, narrowing vessels and choking off blood. What you may not know is that research has shown that vascular disease patients who cut their total cholesterol by about 20 percent reduced their heart attack risk by two-thirds, says Dr. DiBianco.

“This helped convert soft, vulnerable plaques into more stabilized plaques that are less likely to break off and clog arteries,” Dr. DiBianco says. According to the American Heart Association, your goal should be to try to keep your total cholesterol under 200 milligrams per deciliter. Borderline high cholesterol is 200 to 239 milligrams per deciliter, while high cholesterol is over 240 milligrams per deciliter. One of the best ways to lower your cholesterol is to eat less saturated fat, the kind found in meat and dairy products, says Dr. DiBianco.

Bring down your blood pressure. Here are some more numbers that can help add up to a healthy heart and a longer, more active life. When checking your blood pressure-once or twice a year should do-look for a reading of 120/80 millimeters of mercury (pronounce it “120 over 80″ just like they do on your favorite hospital drama). That’s considered normal. A reading above 140/90 should be of concern. And when your blood pressure is over 160/100, it’s definitely too high, says Dr. Pickering.

Stop smoking. If you don’t want to give up cigarettes for your own heart’s sake, do it for your sweetheart’s sake. A seven-year study of 353,180 women and 126,500 men who had never smoked found that those who lived with smokers had a roughly 20 percent greater risk of death from heart disease.

*86/36/5*

Comments (0) Apr 23 2009

REASONS OF EATING DISORDERS AROUSAL: FAMILY AND SOCIOCULTURAL PERSPECTIVES

Posted: under Weight Loss.
Tags:

The Family Perspective

I would be hard pressed to think of a patient whose family life had no direct bearing on the way her disorder developed. Volumes have been written on the role of family dynamics in anorexia and bulimia.

Some patterns that have been identified in certain eating-disordered families include an overemphasis on appearance, social isolation, emotional rigidity, and the inability to resolve conflicts. However, there is no such thing as a “typical” eating-disordered family. The same dynamic that triggers an eating disorder in one person may allow another to thrive. In Chapter Eleven we’ll learn more about the family’s influence on eating disorders, and how family therapy can be a vital component of treatment.

The Sociocultural Perspective

To sociologists, eating disorders result from the extreme value our culture places on thinness. Through advertisements, TV programs, and magazines, thinness has become a kind of social currency, a means of exchange between people. The hidden message: Thin wins.

The other side of the coin: Fat is failure. Chubby children suffer cruel teasing by their schoolmates-teasing that can become the trigger for an eating disorder. Fat people are the targets of jokes and whispered comments. Some find the doors to advancement closed. The cultural pressure to be thin can make feelings of insecurity, self-doubt, or unworthiness much worse.

Other trends stoke the fire. The modern changes in women’s place in society and the lack of models showing how to fulfill those roles add to the problem. A girl whose mother was “just a housewife” may suddenly find herself, at adolescence, expected to become a “superwoman,” adept at juggling career, family, and personal needs. Some women may lack the skills to cope with-or resist-these demands, including the demand that one must be thin. By submitting to these pressures, they hope to show they are worthy, that they can set and reach goals, and that they deserve respect.

*18/35/5*

Comments (0) Apr 23 2009

END EMOTION-DRIVEN EATING: 87 POUNDS GONE THROUGH THE POWER OF PRAYER

Posted: under Weight Loss.
Tags:

Devoutly religious, Theresa Giffin says that her relationship with God has been her salvation from a lifetime of weight problems.

“I had tried everything available to lose weight,” she notes. “I took pills. I fasted. I got a tummy tuck. I did it all. And each time, I’d regain what I lost—and more.”

But for Theresa, prayer succeeded where pills, fasts, and surgery had failed. It happened one day when a coworker left a 2-pound box of chocolates on her desk.

Theresa took one piece, but she knew that wouldn’t be enough. “It was my very favorite candy, and I thought I wouldn’t be able to stop,” recalls the 51-year-old nurse from Fall Creek, Oregon. “So I whispered a little prayer: ‘God, you know that I want to eat this whole box of candy. You have to help me!’”

In an instant, Theresa’s desire for chocolate vanished. “It had no smell, no taste,” she says. “It was like a piece of cardboard to me.”

Theresa joined Weigh Down Workshops, an international program that advocates weight loss through prayer. She credits this approach with her weight-loss success.

Now, every time temptation hits, Theresa says a little prayer. In little more than a year, she lost 87 pounds. j pi

WINNING ACTION

Create your own intervention. When you feel that overwhelming surge of emotions sending you off on a binge, stop it in its tracks. Like Theresa, you can pray. Or you can do what I do: Before I start stuffing myself with food, I say to myself (or sometimes out loud), “Stop, slow down, and think!” Usually, that’s enough to help me switch gears, so I can do something—anything—else.

*72\89\8*

Comments (0) Apr 23 2009

Related Posts